Solution To Killings: Modernize Justice System, “Upgrade The Hard Drive” – Pangilinan

October 6, 2016

Senator Francis Pangilinan on Wednesday night took to social media to address his proposed solution on the spate of killings going on in the country.

In his Facebook post, Pangilinan reiterated his call to convene the Joint Judiciary, Executive, and Legislative Advisory and Consultative Council (JJELACC), which was last convened in 2009 and granted the Judiciary a P2.4 billion increase in their budget.


“Convene the JJELACC, modernize our system of justice to punish the guilty swiftly and extrajudicial killings and disregard for the rule of law will be a thing of the past,” Pangilinan said.

“I have been asked what the solution is to the illegal drugs problem and I have said that a system of justice that punishes the guilty and absolves the innocent swiftly regardless is key. If our system of justice punishes the guilty and absolves the innocent swiftly in a process that is fair, extrajudicial killings will not be happening in the country today,” the senator explained.

To further materialize his call, Pangilinan filed Senate Resolution 79 which urges the President to convene the JJELACC to strengthen the administration of justice as a means to end criminality and disregard of the rule of law.

The JJELACC, as stated in Pangilinan’s resolution, aims to strengthen the consultation and coordination among the three branches of government to uphold the rule of law, with addressing the issue of killings as among its priorities.

Pangilinan also posted excerpts from the article he wrote in 2009 entitled “Four Proposed Solutions to Help Fix the Philippines” as his proposal to addressing corruption which also applies to addressing criminality in the country.

In the excerpt, he wrote: “Pervasive corruption will not cease unless we punish more and we punish swiftly and we cannot punish more and punish swiftly unless we modernize our Judiciary and provide it with the necessary resources to do so. So many politicians decry corruption yet apart from exposes, they have not presented concrete steps to address corruption.”

The concrete steps from Pangilinan’s article in his personal blog,, were reposted on Facebook as follows:

1. Increase Conviction Rates

The conviction rate of the Ombudsman in the Sandiganbayan (the anti graft court) for corruption cases is pegged at an estimate of less than 20 percent. For every 10 cases filed, less than two end up in conviction. The rest of the cases are dismissed. No wonder there is no fear of committing corrupt acts. More than 8 out of 10 get away it. This is in sharp contrast to the conviction rates in Hong Kong for corruption cases which is pegged at 79 percent. Nearly 8 out of 10 are convicted.

Hence if we are to punish more we must focus on upping the conviction rates to 50 percent within a three-year period and perhaps reach 65 to 70 percent within 6 years from 2010. When more are punished and punished swiftly, respect for the rule of law will return. It is the certainty of punishment that instills fear and respect for our laws. It is the task of the justice system to ensure that the conviction rates are upped. An anti-corruption task force must be organized at the highest levels to monitor the big cases and to ensure that government resources are harnessed to ensure convictions within a period of 18 to 24 months from the time of its organization. The proverbial big fish must not be allowed to get away.

2. Double Judiciary Budget

In addition, we must modernize the Judiciary. The Judiciary Executive Legislative Advisory Council (JELACC) was created in 2007 precisely to address the budget woes of the Judiciary. The Philippine Judiciary receives a measly sum of less than one percent of the national budget. The remaining 97 plus percent goes to the Executive department while some 2 percent goes to the Legislative Department. The bulk of the funds are with the Executive.

By upping the budget of the Judiciary to say 2 percent of the 1.17 trillion national budget we give rise to the swift dispensation of justice, the creation of more courts, construction of justice halls, the filling up of vacancies of existing courts, the augmenting of the compensation and benefits of judges, prosecutors, and court personnel. Through the JELACC, the budgetary target of 2 percent or in real terms some 20 plus billion pesos can be achieved within a period of 6 years or within the term of a sitting president.

3. Reduce Average Case life/Create more Courts

It takes 6 long years on average for a case to be decided upon in the first level courts. This is too long. With the increase in budgetary support for the judiciary, our courts through the leadership of the Supreme Court must endeavor to reduce the average life span of a case that remains pending before our courts. Today, data reveals that the average case life is 6 years. This does not include appeals. This is totally unacceptable. Within a period of six years and with the creation of more courts, appointment of more judges, the filling up of vacancies in the judiciary, the life span of a case on average should be reduced to 2 years maximum.

Research provided by the Supreme Court shows that the ideal ratio of the number of judges per number of people is one judge for every 10,000. Our situation is that there is one judge for every 50,000 or 5 times more than the ideal number. We must create more courts to be able to reach the ideal level and to be able speed up the disposition of cases. When cases are resolved swiftly and fairly then the respect, trust, and confidence in our justice system are reinforced immensely.

If the nation is likened to a computer, the judicial system is the hard drive and its natural resources, its educated work force, and its economic investments among others its software. No amount of the latest software made available will matter if the hard drive is not effectively in place.